NOTE: -THIS IS THE MAIN WORK THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE. THE TOPIC IS œCOMPARING AVERAGE ANNUAL PERCENT OF DI

THIS IS THE ENTIRE INSTRUCTIONS.

Instructions

Group Project      This is not more than a 20-page submission. In this assignment, students will go through the steps to set up a quantitative research study. The Instructor will divide the class into groups to complete the assignment in week 1.  Each group should submit 1 topic selection in week 1, and 1 final report. This report should include qualitative and quantitative sections. Here are the main steps to perform this team project:   Step #1: Topic selection: “COMPARING AVERAGE ANNUAL PERCENT OF DIABETIC MEDICARE ENROLLEES AGE 65-75 YEARS HAVING HEMOGLOBIN A1c BETWEEN MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA. The instructor will provide a list of topics;  the team also should submit the team agreement plan with the selected topic in week 1 for the faculty feedback and approval.   Step #2: Performing Qualitative analysis 2.1. This section of the assignment is aimed at giving students an opportunity to select and analyze at least 5 articles using the 'Review Manager 5' tools to analyze the risk of bias for 5 selected articles following these steps: – The methodological quality and risk of bias evaluation of the selected studies should be  conducted independently by two team members, following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews (Higgins, 2011), a domain-based evaluation for each study should be done across five domains:                     – Selection bias, – Performance bias, – Detection bias, – Attrition bias, and – Reporting bias. The judgment of studies for potential bias should be indicated by assigning 'low risk', 'high risk, or 'unclear risk', for each respective source of bias. Reference Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. (n.d.). Retrieved July 12, 2019, from  https://training.cochrane.org/handbook 2.2. Report your finding using the Bias-Tables and Bias-Plots.                                               Table 1: Literature Review Analysis Authors, Year of Publication Intervention/ Policy evaluated Study design/ Time Period Data/ Study Population Relevant Findings/ Recommendations Author1, YYYY         Author2, YYYY         Author3, YYYY         Author4, YYYY         Author5, YYYY           Table 2. Literature Review, Table of Biases   Selection Bias Performance Bias Detection Bias Attrition Bias Reporting Bias Authors Systematic differences between baseline characteristics of the groups that are compared. Systematic differences between groups in the care that is provided, or in exposure to factors other than the interventions of interest. Systematic differences between groups in how outcomes are determined. Systematic differences between groups in withdrawals from a study. Systematic differences between reported and unreported findings. Author1, 2019 Y Y Y Y Y Author2, 2019           Author3, 2019           Author4, 2019           Author5, 2019           Note: Y: Low risk, N: High risk, U: Unclear   Step #3: Performing Quantitative data analysis design. This is very similar to Individual Assignments 1 and 2 (please look at the instructions for more details). For this section: 3.1.  Select one of the class data sets 3.2. Identify relevant variables 3.3. Indicate the statistical method you used for your analysis 3.4. Identify the statistical software your team used to run the statistical analysis focusing on EXCEL or RStudio (BONUS points) as the main software (you can use any other software such as SAS, STATA or SPSS, but the master-code will be available only for RStudio)  3.5. Analyze the data, state your conclusions and support them, this section should include: 3.5.1. Hypothesis or research questions with a short paragraph to discuss the issue. 3.5.2.  Research Method for this section first report the table of variables, then define the variables using the example provided in step-by-step instruction. 3.5.3.  Report the software and type of analysis you performed in this section including descriptive table and plots 3.5.4. Discuss your findings 3.5.5. Discussion: for this section, compare your finding with the LR (literature review) you performed in the first section 3.5.6. Recommendations: suggest a few policy recommendations based on your findings and LR. Note: Make sure to submit your RStudio codes for your instructor review (for BONUS points).

,

NOTE: -THIS IS THE MAIN WORK THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE. THE TOPIC IS “COMPARING AVERAGE ANNUAL PERCENT OF DIABETIC MEDICARE ENROLLEES AGE 65-75 YEARS HAVING HEMOGLOBIN A1c BETWEEN MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA.

· I AM ALSO GOING TO SEND IN AN ATTACHEMENT OF ASSIGNMENT 1 & 2 SO YOU CAN HAVE A CLUE AS TO HOW TO GO ON WITH THIS WORK. THIS IS BASICALLY A GROUP WORK BUT THIS SECTION, WHICH SAYS “STEP #3” IS MY PART.

· I AM ALSO GOING TO SEND IN AN ATTACHMENT OF THE ENTIRE WORK INSTRUCTIONS BUT REMEMBER, THIS PART IS WHAT I NEED DONE WHICH IS THE “QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS” STEP #3.

· EXCELL IS THE STATISTICAL SOFTWEAR WE ARE GOING TO USE.

ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO ASK ME VIA MESSAGE. THANKS

TOPIC: Comparing Average Annual Percent of Diabetic Medicare Enrollees Age 65-75 Years Having

Hemoglobin A1c Between Maryland and Virginia

I. Quantitative Analysis

Step #3: Performing Quantitative data analysis design. This is very similar to Individual Assignments 1 and 2 (please look at the instructions for more details).

For this section:

3.1.  Select one of the class data sets

3.2. Identify relevant variables

3.3. Indicate the statistical method you used for your analysis

3.4. Identify the statistical software your team used to run the statistical analysis focusing on EXCEL or RStudio (BONUS points) as the main software (you can use any other software such as SAS, STATA or SPSS, but the master-code will be available only for RStudio) 

3.5. Analyze the data, state your conclusions and support them, this section should include:

3.5.1. Hypothesis or research questions with a short paragraph to discuss the issue.

3.5.2.  Research Method for this section first report the table of variables, then define the variables using the example provided in step-by-step instruction.

3.5.3.  Report the software and type of analysis you performed in this section including descriptive table and plots

3.5.4. Discuss your findings

3.5.5. Discussion: for this section, compare your finding with the LR (literature review) you performed in the first section

3.5.6. Recommendations: suggest a few policy recommendations based on your findings and LR.

---

---

Who We Are

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted over our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications and future communication.

Is it hard to Place an Order?

1. Click on the “Place order tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.

2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER INFORMATION" section and click “PRICE CALCULATION” at the bottom to calculate your order price.

3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.

4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.

5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

Need this assignment or any other paper?

Click here and claim 25% off
Discount code SAVE25